Tug of War Over Costs to Educate the Autistic

Tug of War Over Costs to Educate the Autistic

April 20th, 2009 by Valerie Chavez

The eight children, ages 5 to 11, who attend the Brooklyn Autism
Center Academy need intensive individual instruction to cope with a
neurological disorder that can make achieving academic progress slow
and grueling.

During the course of the day, one teacher
is paired with each child. After successfully completing a task,
students are rewarded with a spoonful of vanilla pudding, time on a
piano or a few minutes in a bouncy castle. The system repeats itself,
interspersing work with small breaks.

“Every child with autism
can learn,” said Jaime Nicklas, 32, the school’s educational director.
“If they are not learning, it is our responsibility to change our
teaching procedure, so they can make the progress they are capable of.”


But this type of focused instruction comes with a high price: The
academy’s annual tuition is $85,000. The parents of one of the
students, Ruby Kassimir, 5, the only girl in the school, took out a
home equity line of credit on their home in Queens to help pay the
tuition. “There just aren’t that many options available,” explained
Ruby’s mother, Sue Laizik, a project coordinator at Columbia University.

As
the number of autism diagnoses has risen, the extraordinary cost of
educating the children has become a growing point of contention. In
2001, the city’s Department of Education listed 3,278 students with
autism; by 2008, that figure had more than doubled to 6,877.

The
public school system is required by law to provide an appropriate
education for such children, even if it means paying for private school
tuition if there is no public school option (although, as Ruby’s
parents found, getting the school system to pay is not always easy).

“The
crux of the matter is that we need to have a public debate about how
much are we willing to invest in making individuals who are disabled,
and sometimes profoundly disabled, have a meaningful level of
membership in society,” said Gil Eyal, a sociologist at Columbia
University who has done research on autism.

Of the more than
6,800 children with autism recorded by the city’s public schools, 4,200
are enrolled in special education classes with a small
student-to-teacher to ratio, 285 students are part of a program where
children with autism are taught alongside regular education students
and 28 are in a charter school with a one-to-one ratio between teachers and students. That school, the New York Center for Autism Charter School, is the only public school in New York City offering intensive one-on-one instruction.

Other
autistic students attend private schools from a list of those approved
by the state, and their tuition, which ranges from $30,800 to $48,100,
is paid by the city’s Education Department. Finally, if parents are
dissatisfied with any of the options offered by the public schools,
they can choose another private school, one not on the list, at their
own expense and seek to have the cost reimbursed by the city.

For
all special education students, the department paid $88.9 million for
private school tuition last year, compared with $57.6 million in 2007.
“Private school tuition claims are a growing burden for us,” said
Michael Best, the Education Department’s general counsel.

Ms.
Laizik, Ruby’s mother, entered her daughter in the lottery for the New
York Center for Autism, and said she broke into tears when she learned
that Ruby had not gotten one of the spots on the waiting list. “That’s
when it really hit me, how hard it’s going to be,” Ms. Laizik said.

Three separate evaluations of Ruby, between the ages of 2 and 5, emphasized the need for one-to-one instruction.

So
when she was not able to enroll Ruby in the public charter school, Ms.
Laizik sent her to the private Brooklyn Autism Center Academy and filed
a claim with the Education Department seeking tuition reimbursement.

After
a hearing, a departmental judge ruled in March that Ruby’s parents were
entitled to a 30 percent tuition reimbursement because the city had
failed to offer Ruby appropriate placement. They are now appealing to
the New York State Education Department’s Office of State Review for
the remainder of the tuition.

For the parents of autistic and
other special-needs children, springtime is usually when they hear back
from the city’s Education Department about their claims for private
school tuition reimbursement.

During the 2007-8 school year,
there were 4,375 reimbursement hearing requests for special education
students, 462 of them for children with autism.

“We are
concerned that some parents see this as a way for us to pay for private
school,” Mr. Best said. “It’s not supposed to be a vehicle to get
private school tuition if there’s something appropriate available in
the public schools.”

But parents of autistic children and their
advocates argue that any hope for progress requires the kind of
concentrated intervention that the public schools cannot always provide.

“The
giant elephant in the room, if one in 150 children are being diagnosed
with autism, is that they have the same life expectancy,” said Gary S.
Mayerson, a lawyer who has represented more than 1,000 families,
including Ruby’s, making claims for tuition reimbursement. “Either
invest the money now for effective programming or find that your
efforts are inadequate.

“At some point you may be staring at
the prospect of an even more expensive residential placement — and the
state will be footing the bill.”

Despite the onerous financial
burden they are confronting, Ruby’s parents are pleased with their
decision, having seen that their daughter has made significant progress
since she started at the school in September.

Ultimately, the goal is for Ruby to be able to learn in a mainstream classroom.


“The thing that stays with me the most is what kind of life she will be
able to have,” said Ruby’s father, Ron Kassimir, 51, an associate
provost at the New School.

His
wife, Ms. Laizik, added, “When you have a child like Ruby, you realize
how much of a role you have to play in that outcome, how involved you
have to be to affect that outcome — especially early on, when the
stakes are so very high.”

LINK: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/19/education/19autism.html?ref=education

Results 1 - 3

  • Madeline

    It's an investment that many are unable to make.  The financial cost of treatment is indeed quite crushing on a family budget, especially if one parent stays at home.  Out here the cost of therapy alone is outrageous especially when you take account of PPO [premium] insurance payments for a 65% payout at best.

    There definitely need to be some changes, I just can't imagine how that will come about without consensus.

    Best wishes

    34 months ago

  • Michael

    Should 'Autistic and other L/.D. People', be educated, in 'different Schools', e.g.:  'Creative Learning ones', to learn to 'harness our Creativity', e.g. to write -up books, learn to Direct Films and so on?!

    34 months ago

  • Michael

    I 'Believe -in'; 'Self -Help'.  Here is an exam.-

    'Autistic Consumers' -(general 'Autistic people'; to be-come a Consumer group), offer to buy from, people who support 'them'.  (I have 'Autistic Traits', but don't think that I am act. 'Autistic'). 

    Also; in 'the Autistic/Autism Lobby' -ALL Possib.  'Autistic peoples'; offer to; 'vote for the Pol. Party', which offers 'them'; the msot funds/funding Altogether'!!

    Suggestions welcome -but please keep them -'kind and constructive'.

    34 months ago

Sign In to leave a comment.